by William Markhham | Nov 10, 2017 | Antitrust Litigation and Counseling
On conventional antitrust grounds, which have not been argued in a generation but remain sound law and the controlling law, the Department of Justice should block the proposed merger of AT&T and Time-Warner. AT&T is a dominant distributor of media content,...
by William Markhham | Nov 2, 2017 | Antitrust Litigation and Counseling
A media columnist for the NY Times has suggested in a recent column that it is better that the essential technology platforms are operated by only five large companies — Google (Alphabet), Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple. (See NY Times, Nov. 1, 2017,...
by William Markhham | Jun 27, 2017 | Antitrust Litigation and Counseling
Amazon has announced that it plans to acquire all of the stock of Whole Foods Market, the nation’s largest retailer of high end, organic groceries. Amazon already sells groceries at retail, filling online orders and making home deliveries, and it likely seeks to...
by William Markhham | Apr 2, 2017 | Antitrust Litigation and Counseling
The Trump Administration, working with a coalition in Congress, apparently intends to propose a border-adjustment tax or “BAT.” Under this tax, a company subject to US tax law will no longer be permitted to deduct the cost of any good or service that it imports, and...
by William Markhham | Oct 5, 2016 | Antitrust Litigation and Counseling
The Third Circuit recently issued a brilliant decision on the issue of determining the relevant geographic market in hospital cases (FTC v. Penn State Hershey Medical Center (3rd Cir. 2016, Case No. 16-2365). Hershey specifically concerns the antitrust challenge...
by William Markhham | Sep 7, 2016 | Antitrust Litigation and Counseling
Exclusive-dealing can constitute an antitrust violation under certain circumstances. If a firm becomes the exclusive dealer of a good, it can be held liable under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which condemns only practices that have already harmed competititve...
